User:Mmatisse/Aldine Press/Mmatisse Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Aldine Press

Lead
Lead evaluation

The lead of this article is overly detailed. It provides almost a brief history of the Aldine Press instead of a summary of the actual article. If I were to make a suggestion, I would completely redo the lead, and create a section called "History" combining the detailed information from the lead and the "Beginnings" section.

Content evaluation
The content appears to be up to date, with the newest sources being from the last 3-5 years. It is all relevant to the topic and I don't think any of it doesn't belong there. I especially like the detailed list of things published by the press. However, there are some sections that lack clarification or details that could have aided in the understanding.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the article is generally neutral, and I don't believe any of the sections had any bias.

Sources and references evaluation
Almost all the information is backed up by good sources, but there are a few areas that could use some citations to back up the information. There is a huge variety of sources, most of the sources are over 20 years old, but the accuracy of the information hasn't changed, and there are at least five sources that are from the last five years. I checked a few of the links and they all worked.

Organization evaluation
The content is well written, I saw a few minor grammatical errors, no spelling errors. There could be work done to make some areas more concise. As far as organization, I mentioned my suggestions in the lead evaluation section.

Images and Media
There are a selections of images that do aid in understanding, and are well captions, but it would have been helpful to see an image of the actual press if one is available. All the pictures appear to meet copyright regulations.