User:Mmbennet/Anowa/ATlakehead Peer Review

Hi Dr Guttman,

I couldn't find the section to peer review for Wayde compton so I'll post it here.

Lead: The overall lead was adequately informative; the introductory sentence was concise and gave a clear description as to who Wayde Compton was. The lead wasn’t overly detailed, it had enough information that described a basic overview of his occupation, his community involvement aspect of his career, and accomplishments. The lead introduced a great variety of detailed information and timeline that could’ve been elaborated throughout the article.

Content: the content in the lead had a lot more information and could’ve been presented in the content. The lead had a brief overview of his charitable work and involvement in the community. I hoped to see more of the books the feedback and engagement he receives as a Black writer. However, only the bibliography and anthology of his work was covered throughout the wiki page.

Tone and Balance: the content that was added was neutral. There were no claims that were heavily biased to any particular position. All information was represented in a fair way. The tone was professional.

Source and references: all of the references were reliable and current. All of the links worked, even the secondary source of information was credible and relevant to the information provided.

Organization: this article is well organized through-out the lead. We see the information about Wayde Compton’s life well-structured in the lead and his works in the bibliography. The content is well organized in sections throughout the bibliography. No spelling errors detected.

Image and Media: the image and media is relevant to Wayde Compton’s life. They were well captioned. The visuals that the group has contributed to the article distinguishes who Wayde Compton is in his element. The images adhere to Wikipedia is copyright regulations, they were captioned according to the visuals in the moment. The media provided enhances the topic and was a good representation of Compton for this article.

Overall impression: my overall impression of this article was good, I hope to see more information about his involvement in charity, in grassroots organization, his works even as a Black writer that impact could’ve been expounded on. The cotton added improve the overall quality of the article, the images and media were a strength that was added because of the visual representation.