User:Mmbennet/Anowa/Kenzzippel Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Anowa, I had 3 different people linked beside peer review. All of those linked names were blank...


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Anowa


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anowa

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article written on the play titled Anowa was well written. The article was short, precise and stayed on topic. The only thing distracting in the article is the warning on the top of the page saying the article lacks inline citations. I felt the article had a moderate amount of references listed at the bottom but I do agree the article itself lacks citations throughout. However, there are a few numbers in the bottom paragraph that were not linked and I feel those are citations that might have been missed. Other than those few numbers, the rest of the citation links work and are correctly put. The article is neutral. I found no opinions or blatant sentences. The topic of both masculinity and femininity in the text are discussed. The article was not accompanied by any images which I feel could have been helpful for viewers to identify the intention of this piece being viewed as a performance rather than to be one just reading the script. There is no information out of date but there could have been more detail about the story and its message.