User:Mmccartney1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Rafa Nadal Academy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I am choosing to evaluate this article because I have an interest in tennis. I have been playing tennis for almost five years now and I love watching Nadal on TV whenever he is playing. I have also heard of his academy before but I do not know much about it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) I feel like the lead section could have been longer and given more details. I feel like it lacks a lot of background information and while we know a small amount about the camp there is more about the camp that should be stated in this section. For the tone and balance section, I think that the article is not up to date. While I do not know too much about his camp I do know that more has happened with it than is mentioned in this article. Even though it is not up to date it is relevant to the topic of Nadal Academy. There is no content that does not belong in this article all of it is relevant to the topic. It also does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equality gaps. The tone and balance are very natural and do not give an opinion whatsoever. They are stating strictly facts and do not give their own opinion. All of the facts are backed by sources and most of the sources are current. Since the latest source date I see is 2016 and the most recent is 2023. There are more sources from 2023 than any other year so I would say their sources are current. The sources are also written by many different authors and they reflect the topic that is being written about. The source links also do work. The article is quite small so I think it could be expanded upon but other than that I believe it is well written with no grammatical errors. It is also well organized with different paragraphs talking about different aspects of the camp. The talk page has not been used yet for my article. Overall, the article gives you a good starting point for information on Rafa Nadal Academy. Some of the strengths would be that it is easy to read and understand and that the sources are up-to-date and relevant. The article can be improved by lengthening it and adding more to it. Going into greater detail about many different aspects of the camp and just overall explaining things more. I would say this article is underdeveloped and really just a starting place to get very basic information about this camp.