User:Mmg0023/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Emetophobia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article to evaluate, because I unfortunately suffer from emetophobia. I am hoping that I can help people that may also suffer from this understand it better or who people that need a better understanding.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

- Yes

- Some but not all

- No

- Some yes

Context

- Yes

- Some is new and some is pretty outdated

- Some of the formating seems a little bit wonky. I think some things could be grouped together

-Yes

Tone and Balance

-Yes

-No

-Yes

-Yes

-No

Sources and References

-Yes

-Yes

-No

-Yes

- Some are journals

-They work

Organization and Writing Quality

- It choppy in some spots, it could also be reorganized to make more sense

- Not that I have noticed to far

-Some sections can be condensed or reorganized

Images and Media

-No images are presented

Talk Page Discussion

-In the talk page section their are people discussing on how they suffer from emetophobia and how this article is very accurate.

- This is rated a start class article. Yes this is a Wikiproject of Psychology

Overall Impressions

-I think that the article overall is very informative. I also feel like people that suffer from Emetophobia can feel safe and not alone from reading this article.

-I think the article strengths is not being biased

-Something the article can improve on is formatting, it was a tiny bit confusing

- I think that this article is well developed for a starter class article