User:Mmp2818/George Otto Gey/Natalielarimore Peer Review

Everything seems relevant to the user's chosen article. All ideas are well written and sources are used for new information. The user uses neutral language and does not convey a personal bias. The user investigates the science that the cell biologist studies and provides a clear depiction of his research.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)