User:Mmswens/Web skimming/Caseymen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mmswens


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Web skimming
 * Web skimming

Evaluate the drafted changes
- The Lead was able to give me a quick and concise understanding of the chosen topic, Web skimming.

- The content of the writing is clear, concise, and easy-to-read. It's also relevant to the topic at hand, not straying away at all.

- I do believe that there is some bias shown in this writing. In the second paragraph it starts off "with web skimming, it is not as simple as it may seem." This sentence is biased because it is subjective. Also, in the first paragraph, the sentence "it really took the center stage" is somewhat biased. This sentence leads into information that's missing. If it did take the center of the stage, some facts should be provided to back this up.

- This content is up-to-date because it is an issue that many people experience. There was also a reference back to an attack in 2018, which is not too long ago.

- The source cited was only used in the lead and it's taken from a blog. However, upon doing more research, this website is a cybersecurity company that specializes in web-threats. I would believe that this source is reliable because of the company's background and mission statement.

- More sources should be used in the overall article body, there are currently no sources there.

- Grammatically, there are no issues. There are also no issues with spelling. Overall, it is written well.

- The article is broken into two paragraphs. The first paragraph introduces the idea of web skimming and the second paragraph delves deeper into the specifics of it, introducing various methods. I believe that this formatting of the article is well-organized since they're two different ideas.