User:Mmurdockgcsu/Aquatic invasive species in Canada/Sgkimbrell Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mmurdockgcsu, Aculpepper1324, johnc2022


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mmurdockgcsu/Aquatic_invasive_species_in_Canada?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aquatic invasive species in Canada

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) I like that this article has a significant amount of info about each species, like physical characteristics and adaptations. The spiny waterflea section explains why it is invasive very well, I understood everything without having to visit any sources or do any research.
 * 2) I would suggest that a "why" or "how" the species is invasive be added to the Grass Carp section. It would make this section more clear and prevent the reader from having to do more research.
 * 3) Something that could applicable to our own article is dates and times, it is interesting how there is a specific location or date for many of these organisms. My article would benefit from having an more example locations.
 * 4) The sections are presented well, I could easily distinguish between the freshwater and salt water species.
 * 5) From the sources I saw, they are all informative and did not have the intention to "prove" whether a species was invasive or not, so I think the general perspectives are relayed well in the article.
 * No
 * No
 * 1) Yes, most sources are from journals or reliable government websites.
 * No, each section has at least three sources that make it balanced.
 * 1) Each sentence is cited well with valid references.