User:Mmxttma/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Artificial intelligence

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Artificial intelligence is gaining more popularity as technical advances are made. This definition of popular doesn't necessarily mean it is well recieved but rather the topic is being frequently more discussed. In job fields regarding technology, artificial intelligence is always brought up because of a multitude of reasons. The biggest is the possible threat of artificial intelligence taking over tech jobs.

As a game design and development and animation + vfx major, my job is in the more creative side of tech but it is still threatened by A.I. art generators. Since my major has more creativity, it is less likley to be affected since the creative aspect doesn't apply to A.I. However, this doesn't mean that in the future it will not.

My first impression of the article is that it is very knowledgable. It breaks down what A.I is and gives its definition. There are many sub sections in which the wikipedia article has other links to for further discussion. It seems to be a very good starting point in understanding what and how artificial intelligence is used in different industries.

Evaluate the article

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes. Everything was connected along the lines of Artificial Intelligence. Although there are certain sections that don't mention the words artificial intelligence at all and use terms like agent instead, there is a relationship between the two.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * No
 * What else could be improved?
 * In my opinion, the organization of sections could be better.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Overall, very neutral. The article talks a lot about what it is. There is a section on ethics.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * Many many publications


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * B rated, not to my knowledge
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I do not know if we have talked about it in class but it does follow some of the concepts we have talked about such as progress. A.I. is progress in the technology field. Instead of talking about how it is used and how it affects humans, aside from the ethics portion, it talks a lot about how it functions and what makes it function.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)