User:Mn07869/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:Hydra (genus)
 * Article Evaluation:This is a level 5 vital article rated C-class on wikipedia that gives in-depth information about the hydra. It does leave out some key facts about the organism and may be bias in some areas, which is not good for a wikipedia article. There are also some facts that need to be checked throughout the article, and the main picture could be changed to better portray the hydra. Some claims do lack citations.
 * Sources:https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dvdy.10225 :https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0096392514040063 :https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.158103

Option 2

 * Article title:Taenia solium
 * Article Evaluation:The article is a level 5 vital article rated C-class on Wikipedia and is not very descriptive throughout. It does not use very good literature and lacks any conciseness about the organisms inhabitance. The article provides many facts that may not be true and are not backed by scholarly articles. The article could also be rebuilt to categorize different features where they belong. Overall, the article could use a serious evaluation to alter its form and information.
 * Sources:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891552005702208 :https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1079/9780851996288.0000#page=18 :https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/251913/WER9149_50_595-599.pdf

Option 3
Article Evaluation
 * Article title:Amoeba
 * This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia, but the article could use more images to depict what the article describes. Some details, such as the diet of amoebas, could be expanded upon to give the reader a better idea bout the amoeba's lifestyle. There is also some information that has been added that does not use citations, so I do not know if it is true. The article also overexploits in some areas where information has already been added. The size of amoebas could also be more descriptive.


 * Sources:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bies.20599 :https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-006-9031-2 :https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369527408000623

Option 4

 * Article title:Fasciolaria tulipa
 * Article Evaluation:This article is rated start-class on wikipedia and needs much work. There is no talk section, and the introduction has no context to it at all. Every aspect of this article could be expanded upon, and some features of the Fasciolaria tulipa are not even disucced. I plan to add sources that will help better define this organism and expand upon the talk section.
 * Sources:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347271800064 :https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=f8wyAQAAMAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA44&dq=scholarly+articles+about+the+Fasciolaria+tulipa+&ots=NW9D78sT3N&sig=8nBNDgXO7qTrAYMJwIbOlXrSPOY#v=onepage&q&f=false :https://www.thesandiegoshellclub.com/uploads/1/3/8/1/138179831/petuch_and_berschauer_-_fasciolaria_bittneri_article.pdf :https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Diogo-Couto-3/publication/283215639_Morphology_of_Fasciolaria_tulipa_from_Venezuela_Gastropoda_Buccinoidea_Fasciolariidae/links/562e7a4808ae22b17035f2db/Morphology-of-Fasciolaria-tulipa-from-Venezuela-Gastropoda-Buccinoidea-Fasciolariidae.pdf

Option 5

 * Article title:Chaetoderma
 * Article Evaluation:This article has no information at all. Any new information with sources would greatly expand the article.
 * Sources:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2007.00270.x :https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00435-019-00473-1 :https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jez.1402520314