User:Mn07869/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cnidaria

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I believed my knowledge of Cnidarians that I have gained through this course could add some useful insight the phylum Cnidaria. After reading the article, I was impressed with how detailed some areas were, and how little other areas discussed features of Cnidarians

Evaluate the article
The article does a fairly good job of describing the main ideas discussed about Cnidarians throughout, and it begins with an informative first sentence about the phyla. The article also covered the main aspects of Cnidarians, but did not go into much detail about different aspects such as asexual reproduction. The content is up to date, and even discussed how Cnidarians and Ctenophores used to be in the same phyla. The article was very neutral, as it did not have any reason to be bias towards one side or another because it was only discussing the phyla and not its benefits and harmfulness. Images were used to give a better idea about the type of organisms being discussed throughout the article.The article is also rated as one of the Natural Sciences good articles and a level-4 vital article. The discussion board does state that the anatomy and morphology of Cnidarians could be more developed sections in the article. I believe that the article discussed Cnidarians sexual reproduction and feeding mechanisms in great detail, but did not overly define their asexual reproduction and locomotion. Overall, the article was well-written and described the phyla Cnidaria very well.