User:Mnm894/Dermal equivalent/Zachbergevin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mnm894


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Dermal equivalent


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dermal equivalent

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead includes a brief description of what the dermal equivalent is and its purpose within the biotechnology industry. It is concise and provides scope to its use within the in vitro model. Content added to the main page is relevant and up to date. There is no apparent persuasion of the reader occuring and no obvious biases of the content throughout the article.

There is a clear structure and organization to the article and references to the relevant literature when new terms are introduced which the average reader may not already understand. No obvious grammatical errors are in the article, and all references used seem to be peer-reviewed articles with legitimacy.

There is a thorough explanation of what exists in industry for dermal equivalents at this point. In order to most thoroughly portray the current state of dermal equivalents to the reader, I might include a description of some of the current and future research that is ongoing which has not yet been FDA approved. Overall, this is a thorough description of the relevant biological content and allows the reader to quickly gain an understanding of the dermal equivalents available today.