User:MoFerqueron/Phantom limb/Kassafrass Peer Review

General info
MoFerqueron
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MoFerqueron/Phantom limb
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Phantom limb

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

Tone and Balance:
 * The content added to the sandbox is relevant to the topic of Phantom limb; everything is related to phantom limb in some way that offers a larger picture of what Phantom limb entails.
 * There are a few references that are a little out-of-date, but it seems the information is still worth mentioning (e.g., Pons et al., 1991) that can provide a background to the topic.
 * I do not see any missing content or content that does not belong; everything looks good!


 * She did an excellent job in keeping the tone and content neutral, without swaying the reader to take one position over the other.

Sources and References:


 * The majority of the newly added content has references that back up the information being presented, but I think there could be a couple more references added. Specifically, the section on "Types of Phantom Sensations" and "Neural Mechanisms"
 * All of the cited sources check out! Each one is about phantom limbs
 * Some of the sources are not current (like mentioned above), so I think it would be worth looking into more recent sources to provide the best updated information as possible.
 * I really like how the sources come from individuals of various backgrounds, ethnicities, and races. It helps to diversify where the information is coming from!
 * Reference #11's link (i.e., Willoch et al., 2000) does not work - an error page pops up.

Organization:


 * Everything is well organized, concise, and easy to read. As someone who does not know much about Phantom limbs, the way it is written makes the topic easy to learn and understand.

Wrap-Up:


 * Overall, she is doing a really great job so far in adding the necessary information to the article! I would love to see if any more information could be added to the "Other phantom sensations" section in the original article.