User:Mobamba 1098/Resistance (ecology)/Lazypossum Peer Review

General info
Mobamba 1098
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mobamba%201098/Resistance_%28ecology%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Resistance (ecology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Generally, you have a lot of good information. You are able to make connections between topics, you have a lot of good examples, and a decent bit of knowledge on the topic. Your Lead is amazing! I wouldn't change anything about it. My suggestions are to write in plain language, and keep in mind what the average person reading the article is going to understand. Here are my suggestions below. I've added what you put, and where I'd alter it. I'd also look at what words you are using, and make sure they are the words that best fit what you are trying to say. Unfortunately, with the way it is currently written, it's incomprehensible to your average person. Adding sub headings to the Examples Heading will make the article flow easier, and be easier to read and add to in the future.

Suggested:

Hurricane Joan
In 1988, Hurricane Joan-Miriam hit the rainforests along Nicaragua's Caribbean coast. Douglas Boucher (and colleagues) contracted the resistant response of Qualea parense (common name: Mandioqueira ) with the resilient response of Vochysia ferruginea (common name: Botarrama ); the mortality rate for Q. parense was low despite damaged. Despite the disturbance, the populations were able to recover.

What was changed: spelling checked, non existent pages unlinked, removed contrasting sentence, added source.

Original:

In 1988, Hurricane Joan hit the rainforests along Nicaragua's Caribbean coast. Douglas Boucher and colleagues contrasted the resistant response of Qualea paraensis with the resilient response of Vochysia ferruginea; the mortality rate was low for Q. paraensis (despite extensive damage to the trees), but the growth rates of surviving trees were also low and few seedlings established. Despite the disturbance, populations were essentially unchanged.

Suggested:

Woodland blends
Blended woodlands, particularly those containing timberlands, tend to be more safe for mammalian herbivores, soil-borne parasitic illness and specialized herbivores than single species woodland due to the higher resistance to fire and windstorms. Higher tree diversity leads to trees have more resistance to disturbance, direct benefits of this include more available nutrition, and increase in general species diversity.

what was changed: put into plain language, removed pieces of information that were irrelevant, and summarized information given in a format that can be understood by the general public

Original:

Timberlands are habitually uncovered to normal unsettling influences, which are likely to extend with worldwide alter, and may jeopardize the conveyance of environment administrations. Blended woodlands show up to be more safe than monocultures to little mammalian herbivores, soil-borne parasitic illnesses and specialized creepy crawly herbivores. Admixing broadleaves to conifers moreover increments the resistance to fire and windstorms when compared to immaculate conifer stands. Be that as it may, blended woodlands may be more influenced by dry spell depending on the species within the blend. In general, our discoveries recommend that blended timberlands are more safe to characteristic unsettling influences that are moderately small-scale and specific in their impact. In any case, benefits given by blends are less apparent for larger-scale unsettling influences. Higher tree differing qualities interprets into expanded resistance to unsettling influences as a result of biological characteristic complementarity among species, lessening of fuel and nourishment assets for herbivores, improvement of redirection or disturbance forms, and multi-trophic intelligent such as predation or symbiosis.