User:ModernViolet/The American Woman's Home/Ohmygoshmyhair Peer Review

General info
@ModernViolet
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ModernViolet/The American Woman's Home
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:ModernViolet/The American Woman's Home

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead accurately depicts everything that is being discussed in the rest of the article. It serves almost as an introduction, setting up the scene and preparing readers for what they will learn about on the Wikipedia page. It does not contain any information that is not in the rest of the article.

Content: The content is all up-to-date and seems to be very accurate and factual. There does not seem to be any missing content or any information that does not belong, as it all helps with explaining The American Woman’s Home book. Additionally, the article does heavily address historically underrepresented populations, as The American Woman’s Home is a novel that discusses domesticity and was written by Beecher to liberate families from the strange architectural designs that have always been projected by men in the male-dominated field of architecture.

Tone and Balance: The content in all the sections are neutral. No claims are made that appear biased toward a particular position, and nowhere in the content is there an attempt to sway or persuade readers in a certain direction over another. Additionally, I would not say that there are any viewpoints that are underrepresented or overrepresented. However, I feel that they could also, at the end, possibly discuss if Beecher's book and work still remains impactful in the present day

Sources and References: All the content is successfully backed up by a reliable secondary source. There are citations provided at the end of almost every sentence, statement, or paragraph. There is also a references section as well as a bibliography containing all the sources. The sources are all relevant to the topic of the Wikipedia page, and are up-to-date. Although there may be other sources out there, I feel that they have selected and used the best ones, as their page is very thorough and accurate.