User:Modrake21/Due process/Mosadzi1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Modrake21


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Modrake21/Due_process?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
The draft is concise and coherent, without any grammatical or spelling errors. I like how organized the section is. The citations and links all work, and you use reliable and independent sources per Wikipedia "Notability" guidelines. The Lead is excellent and provides a broad overview of the relevant area of law, while also detailing the sections to come. There is nothing superfluous or irrelevant to the topic. If you wanted to expand, you could add some critical perspectives on Due Process in the form of law review articles touching on the rights of marginalized groups or examples of violations of the Due Process Clause. Great job!

Second peer review:
Lead: Generally, your article is well organized, concise, and informative. I would add a lead to give the reader a general understanding of what Due Process is before diving in. Otherwise, this is excellent.

Content: All content is relevant and up to date.

Tone and Balance: tone is neutral and well balanced.

Sources/references: all great legal sources. If you are looking for additional sources, perhaps try a legal treatise. I would also suggest citing to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.