User:Modussiccandi/Geraer Forderungen

The Gera Demands were a set of demands made by East German leader Erich Honecker on 13 October 1980. Directed at the West German government, they demanded far-reaching foreign policy concessions.

Formulated in a speech to a party conference at Gera, his demands entailed four stipulations: that West Germany recognise the existence of East German citizenship, that the Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations be defended, that the two German state establish official diplomatic relations, and that West Germany recognise the middle of the Elbe river as its eastern border.

The Gera Demands Demands followed a period of rapprochement between the two German sates. They were received with scepticism by the West German public and none of Honecker's stipulations were heeded by the government of Helmut Schmidt. According to historian Ulrich Mählert, the initiative was meant to reassure the Soviet Union of continued East German support in the recently ensued flare-up of the Cold War.

Background
Having experienced a period of relaxation under the Neue Ostpolitik initiative of West German chancellor Willy Brandt, relations between East and West Germany deteriorated in the late 1970s. This downturn came in the context of the New Cold War surrounding the Soviet–Afghan War, and the rising tensions within the Eastern Bloc exemplified by the Solidarity movement in Poland. During this time, the West German government of Helmut Schmidt avoided formulating far-reaching aims in its dealings with the GDR, but rather tried to strengthen economic and political ties to maintain the fading sense of connectedness between the populations of both states. For the East German SED government, this situation became difficult to navigate: even though the GDR's economy had become increasingly dependent on trade with its neighbour, the party still sought to make clear its ideological differences form the West.

Content
On 13 October 1980, Honecker spoke in front of a party conference at Gera and formulated his vision for the relationship between the two German states, which he considered under strain from West German attempts to infringe on the GDR's sovereignty. To preserve the formal division of East and West Germany, he formulated four demands directed towards the government of Schmidt.

His first demand was that the West German government recognise the existence of East German citizenship. He thereby challenged Article 116 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, which mandated that there may only be one German citizenship. Secondly, Honecker he demanded the abolition of the Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations, a government agency in Salzgitter, tasked with the compilation of East German human rights violations. Honecker's fourth stipulation was the establishment of regular diplomatic relations between the two German states. This would have involved the conversion of the existing permanent representation in Bonn and East Berlin to official embassies. His final demand was that West Germany recognise the middle of the Elbe river as the border between the two states.

Reception
In the West German public, Honecker's demands were met with bewilderment. The Hamburger Abendblatt reckoned that they had reversed the recent German rapprochement, while Der Spiegel wrote that Honecker waged war on the people of East Germany. The Schmidt government did not heed any of the stipulation, though some state-level authorities stopped funding the Central Registry of State Judicial Administrations.

Although the immediate reasons for the Gera Demands were never revealed, historian Ulrich Mählert writes that Honecker's initiative was caused by turbulences within the Warsaw Pact. In the wake of an informal meeting between representative of both states, Werner Krolikowski and Willi Stoph, two members of the GDR politburo, had informed the leadership of the Soviet Union about the potential for renewed rapprochement with the West. In Mählert's view, Honecker acted to dispel Soviet doubts about his commitment to their shared anti-Western attitude. This possible explanation was reiterated in a 2020 article published in Die Welt.