User:Mohammad Hassoun/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Abu Dhabi International Airport )
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.....I chose this topic since i was interested in knowing about airport especially for Abu Dhabi.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

1.Yes

2.No, they did not talk about the history of that airport.

3.Yes

4.The lead is concise.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

1.Yes

2.Yes, it talked about all the updates to that year.

3.No


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
It was very clear and his words were illustrating for us the image of this airport in our mind.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

1.No.

2. They talked about how Abu Dhabi lied about the Yamen attack on the airport and said that it was a bus accident.

3.Yes, the transportation issue to the airport.

4.It persuade the reader in favor of one position.


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

1.Yes

2.Yes

3.Yes

4.One of them did not work


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

1.Yes and it is organized.

2.No.

3.Yes.


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

1.very few

2.yes

3.

4. No


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

1.

2.Yes it is a part of wikiprojects

3.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

1.It is accepted

2.The article's strength is in it's history and fact provided about the airport

3.The article can be improved by increasing the images attached to each paragraph to make the reader understand more and more.

4.The article was good-developed but it can be more professional


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: