User:Mohrra3748/Onchocerciasis/Jakexmpt91 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mohrra3748


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mohrra3748/Onchocerciasis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The information in the article presents relevant information with no noticeable distraction from the topic.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Information appears neutral and unbiased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The user provides information regarding prevention, and describes measures that can be taken to prevent blackfly bites from occurring while specifying Columbia as being to achieve elimination of Ochoceriasis sourcing information regarding prevention and control from the CDC.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citations work and the sources are both reputable and in support of the information provided by the user.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from?
 * Facts appear to be supported by reliable references such as the Center for Disease Control, World Health Organization, International DOI Foundation (IDF), and the National Institutes of Health.
 * Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The sources are neutral are neutral and commonly referenced. Bias does not appear to be added to the users contribution to Ochoceriasis.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Information is within the span of less than 1 year to at most 5 years. The information added seems to be sufficient, although more information could be added based on relevancy or novelty as necessary.

Overall, the user contributes paragraphs that use relevant information with no discernable bias toward the subject matter, and the article is presented in a neat and clean way, and with a logical progression using relevant facts and figures from reputable sources.