User:Moirarose2/Evaluate an Article


 * Criminal psychology
 * I think the article could have included more of the history of criminal psychologists, and where the term comes from.
 * The first 3 paragraphs have next to the new section, or within the wiki that lead to more information or a broad term.
 * The reference page has a total of 22 references or sources, which I think is a good amount based off the length of the article.
 * I checked a few of the links to the sources, and they do work.
 * The sources come from a array of authors and publications.
 * The article was last updated on December 16, 2021, which is fairly recent.
 * The article is rated a C.
 * Nothing really distracted, and I think that everything is pretty relevant to the main topic.
 * The article appears neutral.
 * I think the article underrepresented the section that was titled, The four rolls of criminal psychologists, and think it could of went further into what criminal psychologists do, or what their job requires on the daily.
 * The article also provided a list of jobs that criminal psychologists could also go into, I think describing these jobs would have also been beneficial for the article. This section seemed to be a bit underrepresented.
 * Each fact is referenced with a reliable reference. There are a lot of sources listed at the bottom of the article.
 * I do think the Wiki article achieve its rhetorical objection, but I do feel some sections of the article could be longer, and explained in further detail.