User:Momenahh/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Communication studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Since we are studying communications, I felt that analyzing an article talking about communication studies using communication studies sciences would be interesting and also to see how this field is presented to the public in this article. First impression was that it has been written carefully and professionally.

Evaluate the article
The first sentence contains an overview of the topic. The first paragraph exhibits the main areas of the topic. It is generalized and considered a good entry for the details coming in the rest of the page. The page doesn’t cover major researches or milestones of the development of the field. The “history” and “scope” sections are linked to other pages. It also misses the contribution this field makes in other fields and more focused on the history and early steps. The article doesn’t look biased or misrepresent unpopular opinions. It has current sources and links are working fine. It is also concise, clear and easy to read. No images or media has been presented included in the article. The talk page has no useful information nor a discussion about the topic or related projects. Overall, the article is fine but can be improved as it describes the topic and gives an insight on the history of the fields, while  not fully covering all aspects, but it is a good entry to the topic.