User:Monica Pramono/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Engineering ethics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose this article because I want to be a future engineer and to connect it to ethics. I also want to learn more about the history, principles, and obligations. The article matters because I can use it in the future and know more about my responsibilities being an engineer. I thought the article is good because there are a lot of citations and links to the words or paragraphs. The images connects to the article also it is not random.

Evaluate the article
In the Lead Section: The article did not have much of an overview. I think its important to summarise all of the key points but not too short. I just really think there should be more in the first paragraph. Include in major sections and give one or two examples in the first paragraph to give more attention and catch the reader eyes.

In the Content: I think the content is really good. There are table of contents in the beginning so its good to not be lost in an article. Also, all of the contents is relevant in the topic giving the ethical principles/responsibilities of an Engineer.

Is the article in neutral point of view? Yes, because most content of the article is giving more information. There is not much of a person point of view. It is more on research and giving information. In terms of sources, there are a lot of sources that can back up the information in the article so that is good.

In the writing quality and images: I think the article is concise and clear when giving an information. When I read the article, I really understand everything. Is it easy to read? Yes, however, there are information in some of the section that sometimes confuse me where to start cause it is not like in a paragraph form. The images is clear. It is well-captioned.

In the talk page: It is mostly adding information. It is definitely different from the class and in the talk page. There are a lot more technical problems in source check or links that have been modified. The article is rated in B class which is good that means the article does not have major problems and has good article standards.

Overall, I learned a lot in this article for my perspective. The strength of the article is giving a good and relevant information that is not giving a biased opinion. Strictly research. The things that need to improved in some sections to give a good summary of the information not too short or long. The article is well-developed also.