User:Monicro98/Diplopia/Shris26 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Monicro98


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Diplopia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hello, I have read your work plan and the article. Diplopia is very common and thus should have more information for people to understand it better. I strongly agree with your reason to choose this article, it is unfortunately very common for every disease to end up being associated with a malignancy when searched online. Here are some points I would like to make on the article in general as it is now after changes been made.


 * The lead is very good. It offers a good understanding to a person just wanting to know the basics.
 * There are repeated parts of classification.
 * It needs a lot more citations.
 * Binocular and monocular need to have a balance of information. I am not aware in case there is not much information on monocular.
 * The cause and differential diagnosis should be in separate sections.
 * Binocular needs causes, even if just a little.
 * I am not aware if there is information on preventing diplopia, if there is it would be great to add it.
 * It also needs an Epidemiology part.
 * Clinical pearls do not make sense to everyone. Maybe remove it entirely. Add relevant information on CN nerves in the differential diagnosis.

Given the time frame, it is not possible to complete what we had initially planned. Good work on the article. In case you continue to work on it, I have mentioned things that can be added, if not you may choose to ignore some points mentioned. See you around.Shris26 (talk) 14:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)