User:Monika2801/OCAP Principles/Kaitlinabeele Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Monika2801


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Monika2801/OCAP Principles
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Your lead paragraph is well formulated. It clearly lays out what the article is discussing, and is very concise. Great job linking to other relevant Wikipedia articles.

Overall, the article is well-structured. The headings and subheadings are clear and make sense for the content of the article. I might recommend that you flesh them out a bit more. For the history section, maybe include references to some Indigenous research that has been conducted in the past, and explain how it did or did not follow OCAP Principles. I would suggest the same be done with your limitations section.

You do have a couple of spelling and grammatical issues to fix. It is ensure not insure. As well, the final sentence needs to be rewritten. I suggest this:

"An information gap exists regarding the principles, which has led to misinformation about OCAP. An example of this is that some individuals believe any research conducted by a First Nations organization automatically abides by OCAP."

The article includes 3 references, which does meet the Notability standards for Wikipedia. However, the article could be strengthened by including a few more sources.

The other next step would be to look for a couple of graphics that could accompany the article.

You're headed in the right direction. With a few tweaks and a bit more exploration of the topic, I think you'll have a really solid article!