User:Montero.kayla/Multiple births/Neelkoladiya Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Montero.kayla)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Montero.kayla/Multiple births

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No. Lead
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Lead present in original article describes article clearly
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Lead present in original article is concise.

Lead evaluation
Lead in the article was not edited by the user

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Content in sandbox is relevant to topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
Content added to the rough draft is up to date but more content is needed in some section like ethics in management of multiple birth.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
Tone of the draft is pretty balanced.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No citation added
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? N/A
 * Are the sources current? N/A
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No citation added.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No, content is not well written
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, but sentence format is not used.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Organization evaluation
Section need to worked on.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Images and media evaluation
No images are added.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I do not think it will improve quality of the article by much.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the content added talk about some artificial methods which cause multiple birth and ethic in it.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think more it would better if section is added about ethical issue in multiple birth and in medical method to reduce multiple birth.

Overall evaluation
I think article need to more information about medical methods to control multiple birth and ethical issue in it.