User:Moonhater99/Sextus Tarquinius/Romalicious753 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Moonhater99
 * User:Moonhater99/Sextus Tarquinius

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The lead has not been updated to match the information provided by this peer. Try finding more content/re-reading the lead and adjusting to that.
 * The lead introduction on the og page does a good job at describing the person and information that will be provided.
 * The lead could use an introductory section discussing the art forms that the person is depicted in.
 * The lead on the og provides information that is not in the rest of the article. It covers the background of he main person, but does not follow up with an early life, or family section. It would become a stronger wiki page if the editors add this.
 * The lead is direct and to the point. It does a good job at highlighting the person.

Lead evaluation
The lead that is on the og page is good, however some of the content that is being presented does not get followed up on in the later parts of the wiki. I highly suggest looking over this section and finding way to either improve of take away part of it.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content on the main page does a decent job at descripting the person, but leaves more to be desired. The content added on the sandbox mainly focuses on adding external links.
 * The content is up to date on the main page
 * There needs to be a possible early life, family, rule as king, military accomplishments, legacy, or all of them added to this wiki. It would really improve the page and make it feel really like a nice and well rounded wiki page. I highly suggest that you do this.
 * This wiki does a good job at discussing a darker topic in our culture that most people would like to brush to the side.

Content evaluation
The content on the main page is off to a good start. You can improve it greatly by doing what I have suggested above. I highly recommend that you read the main wiki and ask yourself, "What does a good Wikipediae page need?" Try looking at other popular Roman figures like Caesar and seeing what his page looks like, or even Lucretia's page.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content added does a good job at staying natural despite the horrible actions of this man.
 * The og page covers historical facts and present them for the general public to learn about.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The content added stays natural and does not try to persuade the audience. In light of the fact we are in the 21st century I encourage you to think about the bias in any statement you make before publishing it. Try to remain natural despite his actions.

Tone and balance evaluation
The og page does a good job at staying in the middle. However, the student sandbox does not have a lot of original content to properly observe. I would recommend expanding your sandbox, so that you will have more information to contribute to the og wiki page.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * The new content added is hyper links and an image. The image seems to come from a good source.
 * There are no sources throughout besides the image.
 * The source is up to date for the image
 * The sources on the main page are limited and only primary with no secondary. But they are true to the content of the page.
 * The links work when you click on them. This is a good sign, because maybe they can lead you to other sources.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are very limited both in the sandbox and on the main page. Try finding more secondary sources and a few more primary sources to add to this page.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content on the main page is well written and to the point. It does not just copy and paste from its original source but uses its own words for each topic.
 * The content seems to have no spelling or grammar errs.
 * The content on the main page leaves more to be desired. It feels messy and not well organized. This could be due to the long section on cultural references that does not have a nice uniform feel to them. Also, try adding a section under cultural references to make the page feel more completed.

Organization evaluation
There is not a lot of content here. I know that it is hard to find content for an ancient Roman king from thousands of years ago, but I encourage you to really push and give it your best shot! Best of luck! :)

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * The main page provide imagines of the most infamies event in his life, but does not represent him in any other way. I encourage that you find some other images of him to add to this page.
 * The images on the main page are well captioned, but the one in the sandbox could use a caption.
 * All images follow the copyright policies of Wikipedia both on the main page and in the sandbox.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? All the images on the main page are all to the right side of the of the wiki. I recommend that you put a few of these images on the left side of the page to help break up the right side heaviness.

Images and media evaluation
Although the main page has three images, a;; of them depict the same scene. Try to find a couple more that better show the face of the person who the wiki is about. Along those lines, do not forget that this page is about the man not the woman. Although his time as king cannot be discussed without a heavy focuses on the rape. This page is still about him and not her. I recommend that add the image of Lucretia on her page not his. I know that is probably hard to hear, but you must remember who the page is for. :(

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * It only has one primary source on the main page and that is it. Try to find a lot more secondary and primary sources to add to this page. I know it is going to be hared, but I believe in you! :)
 * The one source represents factual statements but leaves more to be desired.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Because the sandbox is mainly copied and pasted information, I cannot arcuately discuss this topic to its fullest potential.
 * Although there is not a lot of original content added by the student the student still does a decent job at expanding the potential of the clickabilities of this article.

New Article Evaluation
You have no sources in your sandbox or bibliography. Try really diving into your research and finding both primary and secondary sources. Because as it stands right now, there is a lot that can be added to this page if you are willing to put the time and effect into it. I believe that you can do this! We are all having a hard time finding sources due to the fact that it is a topic that is thousands of years old, but you have to try. You can do this! :)

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content added has the potential to add to the overall quality of this wiki, but the student really has to be dedicated to putting forth the effect over these next few weeks.
 * The strengths of the content added is that of the hyperlinks. The main page did not have enough in its main section of the information and the student did a fair job at expanding that.
 * The content added can be improved by adding sources and more original content that is not yet on the main page. Look through the main page and find areas that you might want to expand upon and start searching for sources.

Overall evaluation
The student sandbox leaves much to be desired. Although you did a good job at expanding the hyperlinks, you need to really crack down and get some more information onto your page that you can contribute. Do not work yourself to death, but do remember that you are still in a 300 level college history class, so you got to really dig into your research. After all that is the funniest part about history! You got this, we all believe in you and you will make us proud! :)