User:Moonman15/Battle of Tanagra (457 BC)/Michael Cheng2 Peer Review

General info
Moonman15
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Moonman15/Battle of Tanagra (457 BC) - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Battle of Tanagra (457 BC) - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content
The content if generally pretty good and concise without dwelling too much on needless information. If you could find it, could you add in what specific allies aided the Spartan and Athenian sides? It says 1,000 soldiers from Argos were sent but maybe including which other cities might have also sent some could give a better understanding of the compositions of each side.

Tone and Balance
The tone is very neutral and non-biased which is good. No parts try to sway the reader or is biased in any direction regarding the battle of Tangara or its belligerents.

Sources and References
The sources and most references are pretty good. The sources look credible and knowledgeable about the battle of Tanagra and its surrounding history. Most citations include multiple sources that clearly support the topic and lend it credibility.

Organization
Could you add the conclusion of the battle into the section that covers the battle rather than putting it with the aftermath? Its a little confusing how the conclusion isn't with the rest of the battle, just moving the first sentence in the aftermath sections to the end of the battle section might help the article flow better.

Images
The image of the Long Walls from Athens to Piraeus is useful and good. Could you add in some images relating to the battle, maybe one giving a layout of the Spartan and Athenian forces or of Tangara itself? It might help give more context to the battle with a visual aid for the reader.