User:Moonwatch Snowave/Eversource Energy/Football1144 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Guildford 34


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Moonwatch Snowave/Eversource Energy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eversource Energy

Evaluate the drafted changes
There is no specific lead that I can see on my partners article but the introductory sentences in the article body are clear and concisely give the reader an idea about how the rest of the article is going to go regarding Eversource Energy’s economic status and current important news that relates to their company. The content in the article is up to date and relevant as my partner mentions issues including the lawsuit the company is involved in regarding the Global Warming Solutions Act and their long-term plans to reduce carbon emissions have been happening recently. I do not think that the article is missing information or has anything that does not belong. My partner takes an open-minded approach and describes some positives and negatives that Eversource is going through today with reducing their Carbon footprint.

As mentioned, this is a neutral article and I would not say that there are any claims or ideas throughout that are very strong or lean one way oppose to another. My partner speaks on how Eversource is involved in positive actions in order to do their part in overall sustainability including working with different companies to work on providing cleaner energy sources and doing things like “increasing solar energy and improving energy storage systems for offshore wind turbines”. And aside from the positive aspects, there are a few negatives as well relating to the lawsuit the company is facing as well. I do not see any references listed on my partner’s article. A suggestion that I have is to add a peer reviewed or other references to help supports the claims that are made within the article.

The article is well written and is definitely clear, easy to read as well. I can follow it well and it is broken into 3 main paragraphs/topics that are elaborated well with evidence backing up the points that are made. The spelling and grammar seem solid as well. There are no images including in my partners article from what it seems like, but I do think that it would be beneficial for pictures to be added because it adds more context to the points that are being made about Eversource. I think the content added does make the article stronger because the positive involvements that Eversource is a part of makes the company seem more legit on their efforts to reduce their carbon footprint and help the issue of climate change. I think the content added could be more improved if there was maybe a few more plans that Eversource has regarding how they are going to create a more sustainable environment and then possibly another negative aspect that the are going through right now so it does not seem like the evidence provided is persuaded one way.