User:More888/Torngat Mountains National Park/Mic-233 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

More888/Torngat Mountains National Park


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:More888/Torngat_Mountains_National_Park?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Torngat Mountains National Park

Evaluate the drafted changes
The sections are well written, concise and interesting. I enjoyed how the article was organized, I found the individual paragraphs in each section divided the information well. I did not previously know about Torngat Mountains National Park, so from reading this article I learnt about the parks background, wildlife and First Nations involvement. The content covers the requirement of addressing at least five of the topics in the rubric. An area I wanted to know more about is the visitors and activities section, which is only a few sentences long. The writing was easy to understand, and structured well. I like how you organized the sections with headings for each section to easily be able to find specific information. The tone is neutral, presenting the facts and not trying to persuade the reader to an opinion. The facts are referenced in the writing, with a reference list at the end. The references are from reliable sources such as Parks Canada, COSEWIC, and Government of Canada. Although, there was mix of using numbers and using the last name, year to cite references, which I found distracting. So, all the references could be in the same citation style to flow better. The work is well balanced with covering many topics and important information. The information is from many perspectives such as government websites, research articles and the encyclopedia. Overall, the content is engaging and improves the quality of the wikipedia article it is adding to.