User:Moreschi/Bharatveer

Bakasuprman
Continued pattern of pro-Hindu POV-pushing, edit-warring, incivility, and personal attacks. Why we have not banned this editor yet, I don't know.
 * 
 * = Economist not deemed a suitable source.
 * - page history
 * 
 * removes the same material yet again after someone had put it back in.
 * - flat reverting, no reason given.
 * - this was just plain hilarious: category gets deleted at CFD, Cydebot removes it from the articles it was in. Bakasuprman thinks its a good idea to start revert-warring with the bot, makes about 15 of these reverts. Fortunately the bot just reverts straight back! No prizes for guessing what the category was: Category:Hindu politicians.
 * Reverting in tandem with User:Hkelkar, this one is quite a leitmotif. We'll see it again later.
 * Count the personal attacks
 * Keep on counting
 * 
 * Flat reverting
 * 
 * 
 * - POV edit-warring.
 * epic edit-warring to Michael Witzel. Read the article, it's not hard to work out why. Same for David Frawley. Selected diffs...
 * Reverts for Hkelkar.
 * Good enough sources for a BLP? I don't really think so.
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * - my point exactly.
 * 
 * edit-warring continues right up until October, any old op-ed will surely do as a source, right?
 * - charming! Worth noting here that User:Hornplease is most definitely not banned, nor editing at the moment, nor had Bakasuprman's block log.
 * revert to Hkelkar
 * Flat reverting
 * history of Goa Inquisition, I'm not going to list all the reverts, people can see for themselves.
 * personal attacks on the Wikiquette alerts page...one rather does have to chuckle at the irony.
 * Ok...
 * Oh, no, the rules don't apply to me, I edit India-related articles...(admin only).
 * Why not prove the point while we're at it?...(admin only).
 * and again.
 * 
 * Don't we just love automatic reversion tools?