User:Morgan.nguyen123/sandbox

= Article Critique =

I visited the Nguyen Ba Thanh page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: its lack of citations and reliable sources, lack of neutrality, and its brief form of page.

Citation and Sources
I visited this page and noticed that this page lacks of citations and reliable sources which need for a Wikipedia article. It still has some facts with no citation. Some references are cited on the page, but there are no article for them. Besides, I clicked on the links that writer cited but there are some dead links, and I could not read it as well as know that they are reliable or not. Additionally, "external links" would make this article better.

Neutrality
This page sounds like breaking the rule of neutral information and viewpoint of Wikipedia. It also contains a lot of unreliable sources about Nguyen Ba Thanh. Most of information of this page led readers to bias and negative attitude about Nguyen Ba Thanh. This article does not mention about contributions of this person who helped Danang to be one of the best city of Vietnam. It would be better if there were more sources and positive information.

Form layout
This page is too brief and short. It does not have any picture or photo of this person as well as any brief information box to tell visitor about the personal life and political life of Nguyen Ba Thanh. This page just focuses on 2 points that are controversies and death. That is too short to be a Wikipedia article.

Summary
Overall, I'd rate this page as "bad". It need more reliable sources and information which reader need to understand and trust in. In addition, this page is not neutral and detail enough to be a good article because Nguyen Ba Thanh was a good council president of Danang. He made this city better when he was still on term of president, but this page just talked about bias. This can make reader think that the writer is an anti of Nguyen Ba Thanh. Furthermore, this page has a bad layout without photos or information box.