User:Morgan098/Glacial earthquake/Allisonk444 Peer Review

General info
Morgan098
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Glacial Earthquake Sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Glacial Earthquake
 * Glacial Earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead- I like how you separated this section from the rest of the article and defined it as the "lead". It gives a good general statement that a reader could quickly look at if they were just trying to find the definition of a glacial earthquake. The one recommendation I have, which you may have already been planning is, when you add in the "measurement and detection" and "effects of glacial seismic activity" section make sure you add a small piece of information form both sections to the lead.
 * Content- All of the content you added, and are planning to add is relevant and useful. I particularly liked your discovery section because it points out why glacial earthquakes are important and differ from typical earthquakes. You also did a good job at retrieving content from newer sources, I noticed the original article mainly had sources form the early 2000's but all of your sources are from the last decade.
 * Tone and balance- You established a concise neutral tone in this article, good job!
 * Sources and References- As stated before your sources all are current and relevant. Based on what you wrote they also seem to give a good overview on your topic. The one suggestion I have is that you found a source to support your final claim that glacial earthquakes may be related to climate change. The original article says it has no relation to climate change and you're saying it might so either way it should have a citation.
 * Organization- Again, I liked the addition of the section headers I think you really improved the overall structure of the article. I also liked how you organized the paragraph you added in the "Causes of Glacial Seismic Activity" section it was easy to read and understand.
 * Overall- You've made great improvements from the article and from the section headers I can tell you're going to add even more that is going to make the article considerably better than it was before. Good job so far!