User:Morganpound/Society of Wetland Scientists/Will282848 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Morganpound Mackenzcarter16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Morganpound/Society of Wetland Scientists


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Society of Wetland Scientists

Evaluate the drafted changes
The first piece of feedback I have would be to create a bibliography pages with the sources you have currently under the sandbox as I could not locate a page for it. In terms of organization, I think you did a great job of formatting this article by creating a history section and making the main section more clear and to a single point. I also thought the points you expanded upon in the main section regarding the governance of SWS, ten sections, as well as awards and programs was both relevant and well written. In terms of overall tone and balance, the tone remained professional and informative throughout without any bias which was another positive. Another notable recommendation with regards to the sources would be to add in text citations where appropriate. The references themselves were all reputable and great sources of valuable information. The only other recommendation I found was to possibly provide a specific example of work done by SWS if publicized. Overall looks great!