User:Morganprice/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Identity politics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I think it serves as an important example of some of the ideas that inform our discussions of gender and the law, identity politics heavily impacts the way that citizens elect representatives and thus effects the way that legislation and laws are written. Further, identity politics can inform which representatives choose to enact certain legislation, which can heavily impact Americans.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: Solid lead section, includes important figures with hyperlinks. References complementary/ associated schools of thought. Serves as a good concise explanation of the topic. However, makes no mention of particular sections within the article.

Content: Content is relevant and up to date, spans large period of time and is specific to topic. Very inclusive of underrepresented communities (a subsection for many different types of identity politics). Even includes further reading section. Overall solid.

Tone and Balance: Does not read as biased in any way in my opinion.

Sources and References: Links work, many sources cited with wide variety including web sources and physical books. Sources seem to have zero issue.

Organization and Writing Quality: Well written article, variety of sources and very well organized.

Images and Media: Only one image in the whole article, lacks relevant caption explaining its significance; though it is cited properly. Could use some additional images and some work on explaining the relevance of the image.

Talk Page Discussion: Almost no conversation regarding the article, article is rated c-class and is a part of the Wiki.edu foundation.

Overall Impressions: Overall good article, could use some breakdown of the organization in the lead section and some more images. Otherwise no prominent issues.