User:Moro0239/Inca cuisine/Nat McDermott Peer Review

General info
Moroo239
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Moro0239/Inca cuisine
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Inca cuisine

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead was edited to include a sentence about food preparation, which was absent in the original article.

The lead is very concise and describes the important aspects of the article well.

The content added is relevant to the topic.

There is some content in the original article that doesn't really belong, but that is addressed in the draft.

The content that is added seems to be neutral.

There is some possible bias in the original article that is addressed in the draft.

The sources added are relevant and seem scholarly.

The information in the article reflects what the sources say.

The new content is fairly well written, but I agree there are things in the original article that could be cleaned up.

The content is well organized with distinct sections.