User:Morphythepug/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nyx

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Nyx is not a character commonly discussed in Greek mythology. However, Nyx is important because she is the first child of chaos. My first impression of the article was that while she is a minor goddess there is still a fair amount of information about her.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section was good. It gave a brief explanation of who Nyx is. But it did not give to many details. The content was relevant to the topic. It was also well sourced. There were not recent sources. Most of the information came from ancient Greek poems. It does not seem that any new research is being done on Nyx. The article seems to be written in a neutral tone. It gives information but does not try to persuade you one way. The article has a good variety of source's. However, none of the sources seem to be recent. The article is well organized. It follows a logical pattern and has a clear flow. There are only a couple images. But they do enhance the article and they appear to follow Wikipedia's rules. There are a few different conversations on the talk page. Most of them are related to wear the material came from. Overall the article seems to be in fairly good shape. It has a fair amount of information, and good sources.