User:Morrisse95/Forensic psychology/Sdavis81 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Morrisse95
 * Link to draft you're reviewing.
 * https://w.wiki/9CjY
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://w.wiki/9Cja

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information added is relevant to the article topic and neutral. I think it would be helpful to provide additional information regarding the case because the explanation was somewhat vague. The references used are not secondary/peer reviewed sources. Maybe the case could be tied in with psychological factors or research that would provide reliable references? I think more information could be added about research in forensic psychology. Good job overall.

Reply to review:

I made changes to the article by adding more information regarding the case that brought forth the Daubert standard being used by the U.S. Supreme court.Thank you for your suggestions it has helped my article.