User:Mosipovich/Elysia marginata/Taywalk8 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mosipovich


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mosipovich/Elysia marginata
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Elysia marginata

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Everything in the Lead section is clear and concise, and the information is present within the article.
 * The content added is relevant to the topic; it is up-to-date; it all seems to belong, and it does not look like anything is missing.
 * The tone is unbiased and the information has no opinion. There is a clear balance in this article.
 * All of the information is backed by sources, and they are reliable. Not all the sources are current, but that is most likely a result of lack of current research.
 * The content is clear and concise, and it lacks grammatical errors. The organization is clear as well with a clear breakdown of each section.
 * The overall article is informative and well-done. I think the content is great and does not need improvements.