User:Mp201651/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Including the information about what cosmetics are seem to be unnecessary. The definition of animal testing is definitely needed but cosmetics are a known product. This page does an amazing job of staying neutral. Only the facts are represented here making it very easy to understand the topic. I feel as if the section titled "Definition" is overrepresented. I mentioned this earlier as well, but I feel going onto detail about cosmetics themselves isn't needed. Citations seem to be all working and up to date. In the talk section of this page, there is a lot of talk about changing the name of the article or merging it with another but I believe that this topic is large enough and is important enough to be a page on its own. This article is part of a wikiproject and is rated very well. Wikipedia discusses this topic different than in class by having a completely neutral view. we have focused more on speaking our opinion and being persuasive.