User:Mp3frog/Lang Rongrien, Thailand/Fe.were Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mp3frog, Cwatters24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mp3frog/Lang_Rongrien%2C_Thailand?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: It appears that this section is the only category close to finished for this article, so I will be focusing on it when necessary as I evaluate writing style. Y'all did a good job of concisely packing in all of the important general information about he site

Content: This article is still in the outline/draft stage, which means that I cannot determine whether or not there is any specific information missing from the article; this is something for a reviewer to pay attention to after an rough draft is completed. It does seem like the content added so far to the introduction is relevant to the site and up-to-date. Just make sure to flesh things out and y'all will be golden!

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is very factual, which is exactly what I was looking for in other articles; there isn't any evidence of bias or personal opinions for the time being which is a goos sign.

Sources and References: There isn't an actual references section of the article at the moment, though I'm sure that will change as you add to your article. Make sure that the articles you do cite are peer-reviewed, academic ones, and that you are properly citing them and linking them in Wikipedia.

Organization: There appears to be a rough outline for the article as indicated by the headers and subheaders included in the article so far. I think that each of the topics presented is important to your article specifically, just make sure that, sequentially, they tell a story.

Images and Media: N/A

For New Articles Only: The article meets the Wikipedia notability requirements. There is some preliminary organization happening, but I would advise y'all to use more subheaders in order to group topics that are more closely related to each other. I would also suggest adding links to other Wikipedia articles as much as possible (for example, it's pretty easy to link to the page for the country and province that your site is located in) and adding in an info box (see the tutorial Dr. Carter posted in Canvas). These changes will help make your article more engaging and professional.

Overall Impressions: For an article begun from nothing, y'all have definitely improved the overall quality of the article so far. Continue to expand on the content as much as possible so that you have a clearer idea of how far you are from being finished and people can give you more targeted feedback.