User:MpASU/sandbox

Article being evaluated: Aten
The introduction paragraph has no citations, only links to other articles that explain vocabulary terms. The "Overview" paragraph has no citations. Specifically, there are a lot of facts and a quotation that are not cited. Details in the "Worship" section, specifically the last few sentences, have no citations. I would also classify the citations that are at the beginning of the "Worship" section as unreliable. There are no citations at all for the "Royal titulary" section. This section also has confusing wording, and is at times hard to comprehend (specifically the last few sentences). Most of the citations are from books, and per Wikipedia's suggestion, there should be a greater volume of journals and other source material. --MpASU (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)