User:Mpfont15/Nutritional epigenetics/Astranle Peer Review

General info
Mpfont15
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mpfont15/Nutritional_epigenetics?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nutritional epigenetics

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has not been updated with new content by the group. The article already has a good introductory sentence that clearly describes the group's topic, but the lead section needs to include a brief overview of the article and its major sections. There does not seem to be any new content that has been added to the article yet, but the content that is already in the article seems relevant and up to date. Some of the sections in the article could be combined together to make the article flow better. For example, the "Epigenetic Stressors" and "Food insecurity" sections could be combined since the content in both sections seem to relate to each other. The article content also needs to include more information about the epigenetics side rather than just the nutrition aspect. The overall tone of the article is neutral. Although, the content does seem to focus more on the negatives of nutrition epigenetics. Most of the references are from reliable sources, which is good, and the links seem to work. The content is clear and contains few errors, but the organization could use work so that the article flows better. No images have been added, but they could be used to enhance the article. Overall, the group does not seem to have added any new content to the article, so my suggestion would be to just focus on adding and drafting new material to the article now.