User:Mpfont15/Nutritional epigenetics/PidgeonTrainer Peer Review

General info
Mpfont15
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mpfont15/Nutritional epigenetics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nutritional epigenetics

Lead
This section is not relevant because it has not been started yet.

Content
The content that has been added so far is very relevant to the topic. The effects of a poor prenatal diet on DNA methylation is a good example of environmental epigenetics. In terms of the content of the section on methylation, I would only change how the topic is presented. More context should be given that leads the reader into the content. A sentence or two could fix the problem easily. Our draft does the same thing. I assume the information presented in the methylation section is up to date, but it is hard to tell without doing my own research. The only issue here is that not much original content has been added to the sandbox yet. The paragraph here is what was already written in the article with a small edit. It is still very early in the writing process, so there is plenty of time to add more content.

Tone and Balance
I have less to say about the tone and balance than I do for the content. The group did an excellent job of maintaining a neutral tone and keeping any biases out of the section with the edit. As long as they keep up what they have been doing, they will do an excellent job with the tone and balance.

Sources and References
The bibliography has good sources; however, the group still needs to find where they can incorporate their sources in the article. As is the case with any of the problems I find in the article, this is a very early draft, and it will probably be fixed before the article is done. I looked through two of the sources in the bibliography, and they seem complete and reliable. Additionally, they are current. However, when I tried to find the source written by Landecker, the DOI link did not work. Finding more sources would be helpful, and as long as the current sources are incorporated into the article, they will do an excellent job of supporting it.

Organization
There is not enough content yet to determine how good the organization is. However, I like how the group presented who did what work.

Images and Media
There are no new images in the article.

Overall Impressions
So far, the article seems good - especially considering how early in the writing period it is. There just needs to be more content.