User:Mpg125/Treaty of Bucharest (1812)/DancingDoggo14 Peer Review


 * Syntax errors in all the sections. I know you are aware of this and probably are already fixing it so it's no biggy.
 * The negotiations paragraph is very conversational
 * I think that throughout the whole article the sentences can be more simplistic.
 * Regarding the current structure, the heading names should be changed-- "Leading" + "Russo- Turkish war" just looks weird in all honesty.
 * Grammar issue consistently through the article.
 * I would recommend using grammarly or grabbing one of those grammar books from the library; they really help me personally because my grammar is no bueno.
 * The overall feel of the article is very informal. Once again, I understand that this page is in its baby stages but keep in mind that a wikipedia page is supposed to be extremely formal and the information displayed should be neutral (which yours is so far).
 * Other than that, I think that the entirety of the page could just look a bit better.
 * Maybe you can add a grid that dates what happened leading up to the treaty and ends with the signing.
 * Also, you can add a number of pictures: the Black Sea, the Ottoman Turks forts/ports/etc, an image of a treaty or that one specifically, etc etc.
 * The References look good. I know that you are in the process of gathering more sources but when you do put more citations down remember to put them in ABC order and keep them organized as you go on.
 * I do think that the article can use a ton of sprucing up that will in turn make it look longer too.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)