User:MrBugsyBubz/Inactivated vaccine/Gasdoc1991 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MrBugsyBubz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Inactivated vaccine


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Inactivated vaccine

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer Review of article (as it exists on Nov. 17, 2021)

Gasdoc1991 (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Lead: Solid lead section with a concise yet broad explanation of the topic and major sections to be covered.
 * Content: Great work reorganizing prior work into more sensible structure and expanding sections to include "Types" and "Advantages and Disadvantages".
 * Tone and Balance: Neutral article that did not take a pro-vaccine stance rather presented facts in a logical, well-organized way.
 * Sources and references: Added references from many good quality research articles and other quality sources. Sources referenced were mostly very up-to-date/recent articles.
 * Organization: Great job moving content around from original disorganized lead article to make it well thought out and sensible.
 * Images and media: I appreciated the image of soldiers receiving typhoid vaccine in the infobox. Consider adding other relevant info to the infobox.
 * Overall: Strong work! This article has gained significant improvements through your contributions for the benefit of many, many people that will view the page into the future. In my opinion, this has gone from a start class to C class article. My only suggestion is to consider adding to the infobox.