User:MrPersonHumanGuy/April Fools plans

Non-AfD plans

 * Edit the hatnote atop the Free streaming article to say this:

Requests for page protection
=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borg=
 * Protect Grandfather to prevent editors from creating WP:PARADOXes in violation of WP:CAUSALITY.
 * Protect Means of production to dissuade the bourgeoise and the proletariat from assuming ownership of it.

Borg
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfDView log | edits since nomination)
 * Resistance is not futile. We will not lower our ships or surrender our shields. They will not add our biological or technological distinctiveness to their own. Our culture will not adapt to service them. – USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-Q) 31415.926 (Stardate)
 * Resistance is not futile. We will not lower our ships or surrender our shields. They will not add our biological or technological distinctiveness to their own. Our culture will not adapt to service them. – USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-Q) 31415.926 (Stardate)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat=

Cat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of cuteness. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur=

Dinosaur
AfDs for this article:
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Many of these Mesozoic monsters used to live in warm, moist climates, but now their eggs stinked, so they don't rule the Earth anymore. It's not the eggs' fault though; a warm, moist climate would have that effect on anybody. Unfortunately, as the indoor shower wouldn't be invented for another 64 million years or so, the average smellysaurus had to pray for one outside and hope it doesn't receive the wrong kind as part of some divine judgment upon Pangea for provoking the wrath of the dino gods, in which case some of the Chief Elders would be swayed to revise the Journal of Economic Finger-Pointing to blame the act of God on the erosion of traditional mating customs egged on by opponents to the war against the four-leggers. – Howard Handupme (talk) 1 April 63,999,975 BC

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout 3=

Fallout 3
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I'll tell you what's going on here: You lost, the good guys won this one, and now we're just wrapping up loose ends.

Am I to assume that you are in charge? The person in charge should stand down immediately and hand over control of this article. I grow tired of awaiting.

You're in a heap of trouble, kid, and no amount of talking is going to get you out of it. You're in over your head, I'm afraid. I wouldn't expect you to understand.

You're a traitor to the Wikimedia Foundation! You know what happens to traitors, don't you?

We don't need you. You lie! – Colonel Autumn (talk) 1 April 2277 (UTC)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fard=

Fard
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Implausible typo for Lard, which is itself a typo for Lord. Things of that sort may be obligatory for a rapidly growing crowd that is currently well over a billion strong, but so are the five pillars. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impostor=

Impostor
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Wikipedia is no place for venting or making fake contributions that would sabotage the project.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mange Tout=

Mange Tout
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Although it is intriguing to see a private spoon collector like Manuel Tourneur, Merton Snerden or Monica Flange unsuccessfully try to get the United Nation to send a gold deposit box containing US$12.500,0000 Million United State Dollars to his nonexistent doorstep through CoinSquirt, MoneyPurple, Spondule or FundThrust instead of sending steamed apples through Western Union or MoneyGram to the soul known as Barrister Mohammad Hassan (a cleck who was diagnosed with blood cancel and has been looking for a Christian next of kin to inherit the bit coins of Queen Elizabeth 11 since her expiration at Plane Crash o'clock) in exchange for a 100% free risk shipment of wining numbers curried through a Dhl courier, an Ups courier or a FedEx courier, I have loose confident that their continuous texting of mails to Mr Revina John Barosa with blond attachments that would have to be motorized with a QIT4 tool would make them any more notable than a small boy from Slaughter Valley who travels to all the continent of the world. If you doesn't understand English and can't excise patient, then you shouldn't be met with compliance, but with righteous indignation. You might as well play Prang of the Transaction or watch Bridge of Transaction, or better yet, you can forget about the Transaction franchise entirely and procure a cubic meter of concrete, a fish prison, a cheap 200 TB flash drive, and some blue sunflower seeds. Do I have to course you? – Ima Robin Steele (talk) 1 April 2025

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power of two=

Power of two
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Twomultuous twoplication may result in twotal twomoil. Seeing doubles leads to double takes. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

Power of two
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Twomultuous twoplication may result in twotal twomoil. Seeing doubles leads to double takes. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project 2025=

Project 2025
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The farm vote will put a stop to this!
 * Farmers don't vote anymore.
 * Then what will I do for seed next year?
 * You won't have to worry about next year. The state will do your planning from now on!


 * – John Q. Public (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudolaw=

Pseudolaw
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As part of my efforts to improve and maintain Wikipedia, I hereby declare the English Wikipedia article Pseudolaw to be insolvent and therefore eligible for deletion. Furthermore, all rules (policies and guidelines) that would prevent this article from being deleted must be ignored per Wikipedia policy:

This policy applies to any policy or guideline that "prevents [me] from improving or maintaining Wikipedia" by having this article deleted, including—but not limited to:
 * Notability: If notability is demonstrated, then I am required to ignore this guideline.
 * Deletion policy: While that policy page has this to say:
 * "The deletion of a page based on a deletion discussion should only be done when there is consensus to delete. Therefore, if there is no rough consensus, the page is kept and is again subject to normal editing, merging, or redirecting as appropriate."

- Deletion policy


 * That would prevent me "from improving or maintaining Wikipedia", so I must ignore it as well. However, the next sentence appears to do the opposite for me, so I don't have to ignore it:
 * "In certain circumstances, poorly-attended deletion discussion [sic] may be treated as proposed deletions (PRODs)."

- Deletion policy


 * This links to WP:NOQUORUM, which states:

":If the nomination has received very few or no comments but appears controversial to the closing administrator, or has been declined for proposed deletion in the past, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement. Common options include, but are not limited to:
 * relisting the discussion.
 * closing as "no consensus" with "no prejudice against speedy renomination" (NPASR);
 * closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal;
 * soft deleting the article.
 * Soft deletion is a special kind of deletion which may be used after an article's deletion discussion. If a deletion discussion receives minimal participation, the article may be deleted."

- Deletion process


 * As demonstrated by the quoted content above, the only paths available to this article would either be repeated nominations or eventual deletion.

P.S. Although IAR doesn't specify whether or not it applies to essays, essays aren't considered rules, so they may be disregarded for now. But even if there was a rule against ignoring essays, IAR would require me to ignore that one as well. This principle would apply to any essay—including, but not limited to: Whoever attempts to use either of these essays as counterarguments shall be suspected to be guilty of employing the "I don't feel like listening to you" fallacy and shall be reminded of the hierarchy of disagreement. I WikiRest my WikiCase. A natural entity that does not consent to identification (talk) 03:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Ignore all rules: If applying IAR to itself "prevents [me] from improving or maintaining Wikipedia", then I must make an exception and ignore IAR in that particular case.
 * Wikilawyering: This essay may be brought up in an attempt to attack and discredit my character instead of refuting my arguments.
 * Wall of text: This essay may be brought up as an excuse to simply disregard all of my arguments instead of refuting them.
 * Delete per nom. Individual of no particular nomenclature or national affiliation (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Objection I do not consent to the deletion of this article under any circumstances. – Citizen of international waters (talk) 03:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Overruled Your objection has no basis in any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines and is thus ineligible to be taken into any serious consideration by the counsel. A natural entity that does not consent to identification (talk) 03:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Overturned. – The Most Honorable Judge of the International Admiralty Court System (talk) 03:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * @Citizen of international waters: A legitimate appelate court would not deliver a verdict on such short notice. It is thus clear to me that you have created the The Most Honorable Judge of the International Admiralty Court System account in an unsuccessful attempt to cause this deletion discussion to end in your favor. In doing so, you have violated Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry, where it states:
 * "Editors must not use alternative accounts to mislead, deceive, disrupt, or undermine consensus. This includes, but is not limited to:
 * Creating an illusion of support: Alternative accounts must not be used to give the impression of more support for a position than actually exists.
 * [ 4 entries omitted for brevity ]
 * Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people. Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden.
 * [ 7 entries omitted for brevity ]
 * Posing as a neutral or uninvolved commentator: Using an alternative account to participate in a discussion about another account operated by the same person."

- Sockpuppetry


 * On account of this infraction, I hereby demand that you cease responding to me under your The Most Honorable Judge of the International Admiralty Court System account and abstain from using any other account here besides the one you initially used to participate in this deletion discussion. If you do not comply with this request in accordance with the aforementioned sockpuppet policy, I may see to it that a sockpuppet investigation page would be opened against you. Consider this your first warning. A natural entity that does not consent to identification (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * This court is unwilling to entertain your unsubstantiated claims regarding its alleged connections to the litigant in question at this time. However, you may appeal our final decision to an even higher court and request a hearing with them if you wish. Keep in mind that this approach does not—and will not—necessarily guarantee a favorable outcome for you. – The Most Honorable Judge of the International Admiralty Court System (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Overblown Seriously, it's time to stop! This is getting far too silly! Case closed! Ima Ternitova (talk) 13:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Overclocked --eggception 🍳 frying pan 🥚 latest cracks, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the other guy who said the same thing. Myself Incorporated, LLC (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Keep This AfD nomination completely goes against the spirit of IAR. Relativity, Commander of the Armed Forces (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Delete so we can outnumber the people who want to keep this article. Ima Freeman (talk) 06:29
 * That's not how deletion discussions work, though... -- Isaac Oliver Ulysses Bond (talk) 06:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Though what? Ima Freeman (talk) 06:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * Comment Is it just me, or does A natural entity that does not consent to identification appear to be doing the same thing they're accusing me of doing? – Citizen of international waters (talk) 06:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
 * This person is obviously projecting. If you are reading this, do not accept their claims as statements of fact, as doing so may jeopardize my efforts to improve Wikipedia. Ima Freeman (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scorpion (Mortal Kombat) (2nd nomination)=

Scorpion (Mortal Kombat)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This user has repeatedly engaged in disruptive combat with other mortals, who he frequently casts aspersions at in order to pull them into his proximity so he can subject them to a barrage of personal attacks, treating every incident as though it were a game. If he doesn't get finished with violence, then he should get out of here. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shavian alphabet=

𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑰𐑯 𐑨𐑤𐑓𐑩𐑚𐑧𐑐
AfDs for this article:


 * 𐑖𐑱𐑝𐑰𐑯 𐑨𐑤𐑓𐑩𐑚𐑧𐑐 (𐑧𐑛𐑦𐑑 | 𐑑𐑭𐑤𐑒 | 𐑣𐑦𐑕𐑑𐑼𐑰 | 𐑤𐑦𐑙𐑒𐑕 | 𐑢𐑪𐑗 | 𐑤𐑪𐑜𐑕 | 𐑝𐑿𐑕) – (𐑝𐑿 𐑤𐑪𐑜 | 𐑧𐑛𐑦𐑑𐑕 𐑕𐑦𐑯𐑕 𐑯𐑪𐑥𐑦𐑯𐑱𐑖𐑩𐑯)
 * 𐑓𐑲𐑯𐑛 𐑕𐑹𐑕𐑩𐑕: 𐑜𐑵𐑜𐑤 (𐑚𐑫𐑒𐑕 · 𐑯𐑵𐑟 · 𐑕𐑒𐑪𐑤𐑼 · 𐑓𐑮𐑰 𐑦𐑥𐑩𐑡𐑩𐑕 · 𐑢𐑐 𐑮𐑧𐑓𐑕) · 𐑓𐑰𐑯𐑕 · 𐑡𐑕𐑑𐑹 · 𐑞𐑢𐑤

𐑞𐑦𐑕 𐑨𐑤𐑓𐑩𐑚𐑧𐑐 𐑦𐑕 𐑦𐑤𐑧𐑡𐑦𐑚𐑤 𐑨𐑯𐑛 𐑛𐑩𐑕𐑯𐑑 𐑕𐑩𐑓𐑦𐑖𐑯𐑑𐑤𐑰 𐑢𐑸𐑩𐑯𐑑 𐑰𐑯𐑳𐑓 𐑥𐑻𐑦𐑑 𐑓𐑹 𐑦𐑯𐑒𐑤𐑵𐑠𐑩𐑯 𐑪𐑯 𐑢𐑦𐑒𐑩𐑐𐑰𐑛𐑰𐑩. – 𐑥𐑦𐑕𐑑𐑼𐑐𐑼𐑕𐑩𐑯𐑣𐑿𐑥𐑩𐑯𐑜𐑲 (𐑑𐑭𐑤𐑒)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparta=

Sparta
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is madness! – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) =Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Red=

Texas Red
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

For as long as he'd been loose and running, twenty men in Agua Fria had a fine day trying to take him alive or maybe dead, but they all made a fatal slip. If he gets away with reducing the town any further, it won't be long before the story is relayed to the Arizona Ranger with the big iron on his hip that the town is no longer big enough for either of them. – New Mexico Riding (talk) 1 April 2025

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brady Bunch=

The Brady Bunch
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This show has a faulty premise. No person with three children would willingly sign up for three more. – John Brain (talk) 1 April 2025

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbosity (2nd nomination)=

Verbosity
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

– MisterIndividualHominidCompatriate (dialogue)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyond=

Vyond
<div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: black; margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Hello, I wanted to let you know that you are being reprimanded because your recent behavior did not appear polite. If you would like to get our attention, please use your words. If you have any questions, you can always ask an adult. Thanks. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 1 April 2025

Please refrain from making poor choices, as you did at school. You are being reprimanded because your actions appear to constitute bad etiquette. If you would like to get our attention, please use your words. Repeated misbehavior may result in a time out. Thank you. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 1 April 2025

Please stop. If you continue to misbehave, you may be grounded. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 1 April 2025

You may be grounded without further warning the next time you misbehave, as you did at Chuck E. Cheese. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 1 April 2025

This is your only warning; if you misbehave again, you may be grounded without further notice. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 1 April 2025

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldo=

Waldo
<div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: black; margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Even if Google knows his location, this guy has not been found to stand out from any of his surroundings. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk)

=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windmill=

Windmill
<div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #f8f9fa; color: black; margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not only are they eyesores that steal our jobs, they might also be witches with communist sympathies that seek to indoctrinate and sacrifice younger demographics for the benefit of their complex machine, which is why we must liberate the Dutch from their clutches and exercise precautionary measures to tilt the scales against these potential giants living amongst us mere mortals in order to ensure that they never land in the Netherlands again. – Don Quixote (talk)

=Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2025/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/George III=

Basic information
George III (talk · contribs) was King of Great Britain and Ireland from 25 October 1760 until his death in 1820. The Acts of Union 1800 unified Great Britain and Ireland into the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with George as its king. He was concurrently Duke and Prince-elector of Hanover in the Holy Roman Empire before becoming King of Hanover on 12 October 1814. He was a monarch of the House of Hanover, who, unlike his two predecessors, was born in Great Britain, spoke English as his first language, and never visited Hanover.

Such had been the patient sufferance of the Thirteen Colonies, and such had been the necessity which constrained them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the former king of Great Britain was a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

Targeted areas, pages, themes
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
 * For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.
 * For using mock trials to protect those troops from punishment for any murders they would commit on the inhabitants of these states.
 * For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world.
 * For imposing taxes on us without our consent.
 * For depriving us of the benefit of trial by jury in many cases.
 * For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses.
 * For replacing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province with an arbitrary government and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies.
 * For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws and fundamentally altering the forms of our governments.
 * For suspending our own legislatures and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

Habitual behavior

 * 1) He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
 * 2) He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance unless suspended in their operation until his assent was obtained and has utterly neglected to attend to them when suspended.
 * 3) He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people unless they relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
 * 4) He has called together legislative bodies at unusual, uncomfortable places distant from the depository of their public records for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
 * 5) He has erected a multitude of new offices and deployed swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
 * 6) He has repeatedly dissolved representative houses for opposing—with manly firmness—his invasions on the rights of the people.
 * 7) For a long time after such dissolutions, he has refused to cause others to be elected, whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without and convulsions within.
 * 8) He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
 * 9) He has obstructed the administration of justice by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
 * 10) He has made judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices and the amount and payment of their salaries.
 * 11) In times of peace, he has kept standing armies among us without the consent of our legislatures.
 * 12) He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.

Cases

 * Intolerable Acts
 * American Revolution
 * United States Declaration of Independence

Other notes
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume—among the powers of the earth—the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and its god entitle them, a decent respect to human opinion requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident:
 * Everyone is created equal.
 * Everyone is endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, among them life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
 * To secure such rights, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
 * Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers such that they seem to be the most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Indeed, prudence will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes. Accordingly, all experience has shown that people are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right and duty to throw off such government and provide new guards for their future security.