User:Mrb6789/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I chose an article summarizing the timeline of Thomas Aquinas. (Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I was interested in the amount of work he produced during the time period. Philosophy has always caught my attention since the start of my post-secondary education. When glancing over the article I did not know the philosopher had written over 50 works, but only 39 are published. (Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
The article is fair in my opinion. There are many possible spelling errors due to the titles in another language. There are also many grammatical errors as well. The chronological order of the works is helpful but it could use some more referencing to the dates. There are also categories of the types of works that Thomas Aquinas generated throughout his life. There is only one reference which could be limiting the credibility of this article. Looking through the history shows many contributions without editor notes so it's somewhat difficult to see who added what to the article. There are also citing revisions in the edits. The talk page is not very active either with some concerns about the chronological dates for the literary works listed. (Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)