User:Mrichardson4/Sherlock Holmes/Bcade Peer Review

Great Job on your article. Everything That I read looked very on topic and to the point. Going through the checklist on the Wiki Assignment page nothing stood out. Everything in the article was relevant and nothing distracted me as a reader from the topic. Everything in the article also seemed neutral and nothing was biased. Any claim that was made in the article was cited from a scholarly source. I think you use a variety of viewpoints to get different ideas across to the reader so there is no over or underrepresented positions. All of the links worked in your bibliography and the sources used supported the claims made. I really enjoyed reading your contributions to this Wikipedia page. Awesome Job!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)