User:Mro3/sandbox

US National Anthem Protests
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything felt relevant and I learned some new information about the topic


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * It felt pretty neutral and covered the impact it had beyond football, to other sports, corporations, and even Hollywood
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Mostly about football players but numerous people on both sides of the issue are quoted
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yep
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Lots of online news sources, both local and national, includes ESPN, USA Today etc
 * Not all neutral
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Not that I noticed
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Talking about the length that covers a short period of time being condensed for encyclopedic effect
 * Details of US Flag Code
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Part of 4 WikiProjects
 * Rated ?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Provides more viewpoints than the opinion articles we read in class
 * Doesn’t have the author’s voice coming through