User:MrrrAndersonnn/Internet Poverty In New Hampshire (Initial Draft Outline)/Adam conlon Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:MrrrAndersonnn/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The overview sums up the issue of internet poverty in New Hampshire.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It seems to the point.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The claims are that internet poverty is an issue in New Hampshire.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? n/a
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? n/a

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Most are news articles, some are census records. All of the sources seem reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? The image is self explanatory
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes it is cited
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There are many, many sources.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes it links population density and broadband internet.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? n/a
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths is the amount of information that is presented.
 * How can the content added be improved? see below

Overall evaluation
My question about this topic is at I wonder if the residents of New Hampshire care about the lack of internet. I'm sure that some do of course, but most of NH is protected land or mountains, and their population is small compared to almost every other state. Is the lack of internet just a lack of demand for consumers? I would assume that if there was a substantial demand for internet in there areas in 2019, then it would be available. Those are just my thoughts. Other than that the article was interesting and thorough.